Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Thursday, February 18, 2010

“What to include in your content literacy instructional toolkit”


Mixed literacy media-Teachers should be prepared with many different media to address literacy such as: journals, websites, textbooks, computer resource software and novels.

Baseline literacy assessments-Teachers should assess their students’ pre-course or pre-content literacy. This will allow the teacher to develop their literacy approach and determine what type of differentiation of instruction is necessary in the classroom.

Overall Literacy Teaching Techniques-Teachers must provide basic literacy instruction to all students no matter what content area they teacher to ensure literacy success.

Content Literacy Teaching Techniques and Medias-Specific content areas offer their own type of literacy instruction. It is essential that content teachers be competent in their areas’ literacy specific techniques and media. But at the same time hold strict literacy grading policies that parallel those in reading/language arts classes.

Teaching across the curriculum/content collaboration-Teachers must collaborate with their grade level team to incorporate similar approaches to literacy. This is effective to overlap content area which allows further exploration of specific subjects and offshoots of content areas.

Up to date research-Teachers need to be provided with and keep themselves current with the latest research and techniques in the areas if literacy and their specific content area. This can be done by school based professional development, system wide professional development, membership in professional organizations, and journal and web-based information subscription.

VIDEO 2

Friday, February 12, 2010

Progress Update Webcam Video

I have not been able to upload my video on to Blogspot. So below is a link to view my Progress Update Webcam Video that I was able to upload to Facebook.

http://www.facebook.com/rich.darago?v=app_2392950137#!/video/video.php?v=1231766754558

Friday, February 5, 2010

My reaction to Dr. Moje’s article “Foregrounding the Disciplines in Secondary Literacy Teaching and Learning: A Call for Change”

Dr. Moje’s article “Foregrounding the Disciplines in Secondary Literacy Teaching and Learning: A Call for Change” was very thought provoking and brought up many good points. The extra attention that Dr. Moje speaks of that has been shown toward improving literacy because of declining test scores had almost reached epidemic proportion.

Obrien’s work stated “that student’s beliefs, values and knowledge constrain the practice of teachers”. I totally agree with this research. Most students, adults and even educators look at different subject areas with preconceived ideas of the types of work that should be done in each discipline area. An educator feeling an “unfair burden of teaching reading” is ludicrous. Students read in every subject area so it is an educator’s duty to teach reading in some form to ensure student success in all discipline areas. I feel it gets even narrower when it comes to literacy instruction in the discipline areas. The disciplinary norms that Moje speaks of that students must be aware of for each discipline make learning even more confusing for some students.

Dr. Moje suggested building “disciplinary literacy instructional programs”. The suggestion of these programs due in part to the varied approach to literacy in discipline areas and the expanding media areas of literacy materials.
Even though each discipline area has their own form of literacy instruction, they all need to be on a uniform literacy instruction model as well. Using literacy to explore and enhance content knowledge seems to be what most disciplines lean toward. But, as the article stated, being able to make sense of the texts requires some background knowledge. Traditional texts can be used to provide the basic content knowledge and then the discipline areas can be vastly explored using the different forms of literacy media.

The discussion of the need for students to be metadiscursive not only in society but in their education can only help enhance their success. I agree with the Dr. Moje and the other researchers when they alluded to the need for students to be literate thinkers across many school disciplines. The more adaptive in terms of literacy students are, the more successful they will be. But, until educators and society revamp their ideas toward literacy in the disciplines the struggle to improve test scores will continue.

In conclusion, educators and students need to reconfigure their ideas toward literacy education. This can only be done by a total new open minded outlook for students, educators and society toward literacy in all discipline areas.

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Literacy & Me



My name is Rich Darago. I am married and the father of 3 children (Will-7, Anna-3 and Josephina-1).
I am currently the School Counselor at Hazelwood Elementary Middle School. Previously to being the school’s counselor I taught 7th grade World Cultures and 8th Grade U.S. History for 5 years. I always felt like Social Studies was the outcast subject, as if students did not have to know how to read or write to be successful in Social Studies. I integrated reading and literacy activities daily in my Social Studies classroom and continue to do so today in my classroom counseling visits.
I expect that by taking this course I will further expand techniques for applying literacy activities in my everyday encounters with students through research, course assignments and self reflection.